Meter Opt

Jun 11
2008

GE POWER MEASUREMENT 3710 ACM DIGITAL METER 3 PHASE MONITORING OPT COMM PARTS
GE POWER MEASUREMENT 3710 ACM DIGITAL METER 3 PHASE MONITORING OPT COMM PARTS
$49.99
Time Remaining: 24d 21h 33m
Buy It Now for only: $49.99

Hewlett Packard HP 435B Power Meter Opt 009
Hewlett Packard HP 435B Power Meter Opt 009
$64.95
Time Remaining: 27d 1h 12m
Buy It Now for only: $64.95

GE POWER MEASUREMENT 3710 ACM DIGITAL METER 3 PHASE MONITORING OPT COMM ACM3710
GE POWER MEASUREMENT 3710 ACM DIGITAL METER 3 PHASE MONITORING OPT COMM ACM3710
$168.99
Time Remaining: 24d 21h 34m
Buy It Now for only: $168.99

GE POWER MEASUREMENT 3710 ACM DIGITAL METER 3 PHASE MONITORING OPT COMM ACM3710
GE POWER MEASUREMENT 3710 ACM DIGITAL METER 3 PHASE MONITORING OPT COMM ACM3710
$142.99
Time Remaining: 24d 21h 33m
Buy It Now for only: $142.99

NES Weschler Slimline DC Voltmeter IDV 7806 w Opt 90
NES Weschler Slimline DC Voltmeter IDV 7806 w Opt 90
$339.00
Time Remaining: 10d 1h 59m
Buy It Now for only: $339.00

NES Weschler Slimline Resistance Meter IPM 7162 w Opt90
NES Weschler Slimline Resistance Meter IPM 7162 w Opt90
$258.50
Time Remaining: 10d 2h
Buy It Now for only: $258.50

Meter Opt
Meter Opt

The Double Opt-In Challenge: How to Increase Sign-ups To Your List

Have you ever opted-in to receive a newsletter, or to establish an account on a website, and you receive an e-mail asking you to confirm your subscription or your request for a new account?  This is known as a double opt-in, and it's law, according to the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.

This law is meant to protect consumers from deceptive marketing, unwanted pornography, and to give subscribers a clear path to opt-out of any subscription.  But what does it mean for you, the business owner at the other end of the law?  It means that if a potential client or subscriber shows intent to sign on for your offer, you must receive confirmation from them before you may proceed.

On the downside, this law whittles away at your opt-in list because many people will not respond to your email requesting them to click to confirm.  Often, they're wary of emails asking them to click on an unknown (or forgotten) link, due to well-meaning, but fear-inducing, warnings about viruses, malware, spyware, and other internet predator ploys.

On the upside, those people who take the time to respond to your opt-in request are genuinely interested in your product or your service.  They will contribute to the overall high quality of your list with promising purchase potential.

So, how can you increase the number of people who respond to your request for confirmation?

• Offer an incentive that they can't refuse when you send your double opt-in email.
Offer a free bonus, a savings coupon, or a membership discount if they confirm their opt-in.

• If you have their phone number, contact the prospect
to remind him or her to click and confirm.

• If you collected physical addresses
at the time your prospects expressed interest (maybe you gathered business cards at a seminar or conference), use the physical addresses to send personal cards or notes reminding them to confirm their opt-in.  You can help to keep your correspondence out of the garbage by:

- Handwriting the address on the envelope:  it looks more personal, and much less like marketing material.  It works…just ask master direct mailing professionals.

- Using a real postage stamp:  not a metered stamp.

- Writing a personal note on the back that makes opening the envelope irresistible:  something like, "Here's the information you requested," should do the trick.

- Using a white or colored envelope instead of a manila one:  it has a greater chance of making it to a recipient's read pile.

- Crafting your postal correspondence with the care that comes with believing that this will be your only chance to elicit a response:  Gary Halbert, a master copyrighter, would recommend that you treat each piece of written copy as if your life, and the life of your family, depended on a response to it.  You probably have only one chance to make a good impression.

Contacting prospects via standard post is more effective than it once was, simply because the definition of junk mail has moved from the mailbox to the inbox.  Spam has become a bigger pain than a mailbox full of confetti material, so a handwritten letter or card can seem like a breath of fresh mail – one worth opening.

Work to build your list of opted-in contacts, and you'll multiply your revenue building opportunities.  But remember; be prepared to step outside of the email box to get those opt-ins.

In conclusion, do your absolute best to capture those subscription confirmations with incentives and a variety of contact methods that would please our friends at the FTC.  And once you build your list, know that you'll have quality contacts who have raised their hands high, dubbing themselves as promising prospects with very deliberate purchasing intentions.

About the Author

Bernadette Doyle is a marketing specialist who helps entrepreneurs become client magnets and attract a steady stream of their ideal clients. She publishes a free, weekly newsletter for trainers, speakers, coaches, consultants, complementary therapists and solo professionals. If you'd like to receive invaluable tips and advice on how to attract clients with ease, register at http://www.clientmagnets.com

Is it acceptable evidence for the distance between lines to be estimated to calculate an alleged speed?

I passed 6 lines (at 2 metre spacing) in a 50 mph zone but was nowhere near the seventh. My alleged speed of 57 mph meant I must have passed the 6th line by 0.74 metres. I don't see how this could be measured with irrefutable accuracy because the photo is not calibrated to show this. Has anyone successfully challenged guestimates? Maybe there is a secondary detection radar that we don't know about. I have opted to challenge the evidence in court so someones previous experience could be invaluable. NB ACPO's guidence is for a fixed penalty at 57mph, 56 mph would mean passing the sixth line by 0.52metres so 22cms could make all the difference!

I take it this was a speed camera?

These things are highly calibrated with proof, the cameras not the lines, the lines are marked out by the council and checked with an accuracy certificate then produced. Most new speed cameras don't use the lines as they don't need them, they are from long ago when the measurements were used more.

As you said ACPO guidelines state at what speed you get a ticket, you are in fact speeding at 1 mph above the set limit, so to try and argue that you were only doing 56 would still put you over the limit and make you look silly.

Personally I always ask for court costs which for a 1/2 day hearing is means tested and can cost you up to £500, you've strangely not said if you were speeding or are they fitting you up?

Just pay the fine.

Smart Meter Opt Out Program

Comments are closed.